![]() |
|
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
(#1)
|
|
(#2)
|
|
(#3)
|
|
||||
|
05-12-2003, 12:03 PM
Quote:
I get upset when I see guys under 30 piling up all of these high pitch counts. Once they are over 30, they seem more capable of handling them. However, a pitcher only has so many throws in the arm before it finally goes. Look at your pitchers who have been able to sustain their dominance over the years and it is all of your big legs/trunk guys like Seaver, Schilling, Clemens, Morris, and Ryan. None of your young guys today are built along those same lines and rely an awful lot on their arm and nibble at the plate. 20-40 years ago, you could challenge a hitter right down the pipe w/o fear of him taking you yard, but when Luis Castillo is hitting 2 homers in the same month, you can see why today's pitchers don't do the same. Site Administrator My Rays blog on the Fanball Blog Network - DockoftheRays.com My Twitter feed Twitter feed for OwnersEdge Newsbreakers Follow RotoJunkie on Twitter The Process Report How far you go in life depends on your being tender with the young, compassionate with the aged, sympathetic with the striving and tolerant of the weak and strong. Because someday in your life you will have been all of these. -- George Washington Carver |
|
(#4)
|
|
||||
|
05-12-2003, 01:16 PM
Good point Moonlight! The fact that today's hitters all seem to have power, makes it difficult for young hitters to go right away hitters, therefore causes young hurlers to throw more pitches. You're also right about the thick leg/trunk guys who naturally have more power and stamina, however, guys like Maddux and Prior can do it with good mechanics. Guys like Wood and Burnett have poorer mechanics and try for a strikeout over an out.
download Milwaukee Brewers player interviews |
|
(#5)
|
|
|||
|
05-12-2003, 01:42 PM
pitch counts are useful in-season, and can warn you of a bad start about to happen--but I think IP at the end of the year are more informative. Players younger than 25 have a high burnout rate if they start pitching 200 innings consistently. You can come up with any number of examples from recent history that show correlation, if not causation, between high inning counts at 22 and 23, and sharply reduced performance around 25. Freddy Garcia comes immediately to mind. AJ Burnett is another, obviously. There are other factors, such as the amount of the jump from totals in the minors and winter ball, to major league innings. Pitch counts and BF/9 are also useful. But basically, if I see a guy with more than 200IP more than once before he's 25, I stay away. That has saved me from more than one disaster.
|
|
(#6)
|
|
|||
|
05-12-2003, 02:47 PM
I don't think Spahn or Marichal were throwing 200 pitches when they were a)under 25 or b) within a couple of years of surgery. . .that's the stuff that makes people crazy about these pitch counts. . . .
Obviously pitch counts are only a part of a very complicated equation but I for one think it represents tremendous progess that people are talking about and posting about them. Jock culture has this very screwed up and backwards idea than if these kids were just tough guys like back in the old days when the walk from the bullpen was uphill both ways blah blah blah. . . In reality, each one of these pitchers represents an incredibly expensive, time consuming investment and frankly, it's shocking more teams don't do more to protect that. I can't wait til someone like Will Carroll combines pitch count data and velocity data and comes up some more meaningful way for us to talk about them but until then posting about pitch counts as fine by me. . . Anyway, just my 2 cents. . . |
|
(#7)
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|